Stephen Spielberg’s jaws got an amazing comic supplement

How to follow a specific type, professional manufacture, and great success Cinematographic gatherings such as “jaws?” The answer, apparently, is to make a series of sequences that succumb to increasingly increasing returns. Although “Jaws 2” is very decent, but it is not anywhere near the stellar follow -up that mainly provided more than the same excitement as the origin (which celebrates the fiftieth anniversary of this month), Jaws 3 is truly a tremendous calm (and less saying about the embarrassment that is “Al -Fousa: the goal”, the best). Yes, “Jaws 3” is a general fun time, morally If you take it as a movie from the independent Shark Shark movie, it is still a sad excuse to complete one of the greatest films that have ever produced. Another more urgent question arises: How did this happen in the world?

The answer to this differs with each sequel, of course, however there may be a specific circumstance that is tolerated in the case of “Jaws 3.” Although filmmaking for distinction is a relatively new thing for the leading Hollywood studios in the early eighties, the same goals are applied at that time as they are now when it comes to the executives looking to sequence, with risk and chasing the trend between them. “Jaws” has become the phenomenon of this phenomenon very quickly that at the time between its release and the completion of the beginning of 1978, that is, half of the decorations or more of the imitators, the explosions, the rang, and the cinema screens that it represented all over the world. “More thing the same” was not cutting it, in other words; If the “jaws” will continue as a drug, the teachers needed to find a way to circumvent.

Although the trend of three -term revival in the early eighties eventually this was a way to circumvent, it turned out that producers Richard Zanuk and David Brown hit a more creative swing than a way to circumvent the third dimension. After “Fen Smitation of the box office is another different kind with “National Lampoon’s Animal House” In 1978, the success of this film (in addition to its imitation wave) Zanuck and Brown to follow the idea of ​​making the third movie “Jaws” a complete comic supplement. Although their plan ended in the collapse, the people who participated in the producers – including the “national vulgar” teacher Mattly Matti, screenwriter John Hughes, and director Joe Dante – may have made one of the most sabotaged honey ever, if they had obtained a “jaw” project.

During the years between the “Jaws” version and “Jaws 2”, “Houple Hought” and “shark attack” exploded in popularity, and came alongside a series of films that ranged between chilling to the camp. In other words, there is a big tune gap between films such as “GRIZZLY”, “OCA” and “Tentacles”. And since “Jaws 2” came when Subgenre has already entered its satirical phase with “Piranha”, it seemed as if Zanuck and Brown were prepared for “if you could not overcome it, and joined” EM “, which Simmons presented them almost without awareness. The sub -type of the same name), Simmons recall the relevant conversation that suddenly became the stadium meeting:

“I have finished in Universal. My next next neighbors are Zanuk and David Brown. The first thing that Braun told me was,“ Dick and I would like to make a movie with you, comrades. ”So, from the blue color – I just started similar – I just said,“ Jaw 3, nothing. ”I said,“ Peter Pencheli comes out of his home in the swimming suit, jumps to the swimming pool, and disappears. He said: “I love it, I love it, I will call you tomorrow.

The excitement surrounding the satirical SIMMONS stadium was not a joke, as pre -production was tracked quickly in the wake of the “Jaws 2.” version. Simons approached two of his favorite national writers to the heart of the script: Todd Carroll (who will continue to write “clean and discreet”, as well as The failed “animal house” television seriesJohn Hughes, who has not yet started a profession in writing a very successful scenario with the National Lampoon’s vacation and as a director himself. Another man was at the time of the exit as a film director Joe Dante, who was exploited for “Jaws 3, People 0” after making “Piranha” by producer Roger Korman, a movie estimated by Stephen Spielberg himself. Dante also remembers:

“Universal was very worried and harassed that Roger was coming out of” Jaws “in the same year in which” Jaws 2 “was going out, and so on, they seemed to threaten the pod.

With the construction of groups, mechanical sharks are made, actors (including in the late 1970s/early 1980s, the sex symbol Bo Derek), and the “jaw” sequel that looked increasingly worthy … even, that is, the plug was pulled.

Unfortunately, “Jaws 3, People 0” was very unique and very concept of the concept that is achieved, and it is not quite clear who put a stop for the movie or why. Over the years, some theoretical that Spielberg himself would not be allowed to continue, as others claimed that Zanuck and Brown had second ideas about mocking their work, and so on. According to Dante, the issue may be simple as creative, good -style creative differences:

“National people wanted to make a comedy made of R, like” Animal House.“Zanuck and Brown wanted the most conservative creation of PG and to be a large -scale family image … I think the project died because they were unable to agree on the movie they make. And you cannot go to a movie with two strong entities such as National Lampoon was at that time and Zanuck and Brown and made them fight constantly through the entire movie. It is just a bad idea, and I think they are They pulled the plug. “

In his estimation, Simmons was more direct and self, saying simply, “They had to choose between me and Spielberg, and I think they took the right choice.” Whatever the reasons, “Jaws 3, People 0” seemed to be very pure (and very ridiculous) for this world. Ironically, the trend that was almost revived – a direct satirical simulation of this type – was something that would return in many horror films privileges that must be followed. She had a precedent, of course: “Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein” sent the 1948 movie “Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein”, the characters of Universal Monsters, and a large group of satirical simulation of the Al -Fawkhari star began. Future entries in the characteristics of popular horror such as “the thirteenth Friday: Jason Life and” Freddy Diet: the last nightmare “, and” bride Choki “also bowed intentionally in the self -perceived humor, and of course” Scream “and her lashes made her privilege about fun in Tropes in horror films.

However, there is an undeniable unique thing about “Jaws 3, People 0” as a lost movie, whether it is simply due to the row of the deadly talent that was involved, or the followers that did not follow being a favorite of anyone, or that this title is ridiculous. It is also possible that the final product deserves all this effort – /Jeremy Smith discovered in the movie with the same extent when searching for its oral history of the movie in the May 2018 issue of Backstory. Whatever the case, perhaps one day we will get another movie “Jaws” and may be unknown. At the present time, at least we have “Shark attack 3: Megalodon.”