Iran’s decision should not be alone Trump, the voices of Democrats and Democrats say

A lot of this week has been made from a rift between Donald Trump’s loyalists regarding the extent that the United States should support Israel’s offensive strikes against Iran – despite the lack of a little decline among Republicans in Congress.

Some defenders of America’s first talisman call him a greater role in the United States in the conflict between Israel and Iran after a week of deadly strikes and anti -anti -anti -anti -anti

Trump confirmed Thursday morning that a prominent report was wrong.

“The Wall Street Journal has no idea about my thoughts regarding Iran!” Trump posted on the social truth. The report said that Trump had signed unlimited attack plans, but he was hoping to force Iran to abandon its nuclear program after a week of Israeli strikes.

The United States under Trump’s leadership, which arose two months after talks with Iran, did not lead to progress in a nuclear deal, the military assets in recent days in the Middle East turned.

It is understood that Israel needs great American assistance in any attempt to calculate the Iranian nuclear program, especially with regard to the Fordow nuclear enrichment plant, which was built underground in the mountains. The Ghost Spirit in the American Air Force B-2 is the only plane that can carry the penetration of huge munitions with an area of ​​30,000 GBU-57, known as Bunker Buster.

“I am not looking to fight,” Trump told reporters at the Oval Office on Wednesday. “But if there is a choice between fighting and a nuclear weapon, you should do what you have to do.”

“The American people should be on board.”

Among the factors that prompted Trump, strangers to the presidency of 2016, his pledge to end the American military adventure after long and costly associations in Iraq and Afghanistan after the September 11 attacks.

“We end the era of endless wars,” Trump said in the 2020 speech.

Steve Bannon, CEO of the 2016 Trump Campaign and the first White House advisor, urges the president to stay in these instincts.

“This is one of the oldest civilizations in the world, well, with 92 million people,” he told reporters this week at an event in Washington, DC.

Senator Texas Ted Cruz did not meet Bannon’s knowledge of Iran’s residents, who conducted intermittent interview this week with Taker Carlson, who strongly criticized Senator to request a change of regime in Iran.

“You do not know the country’s residents that you seek to overthrow?” Carlson asked.

“Why is it appropriate if it is 90 million, 80 million or 100 million. Why is this the link?” Cruz rose.

One day, Carlson Bannon told the last podcast that he was “really afraid that my country will weaken more than that. I think we will see the end of the American Empire.”

Charlie Kerk, CEO of Turning Point Usa Youth Organization and Trump, has chanted through three Trump presidential campaigns, Pannon and Carolson’s position. “There is a big difference between a popular revolution and a change in sudden and sudden violent regime,” Kirk said in a social media post on Thursday.

“Assisting Israel ending the job”

In the Capitol Hill, it can be said that South South Carolina Lindsey Graham is the most noisy hawk, urged Trump to “go to help Israel finish the job.”

“It is time to close the chapter on Ayatollah and his followers,” Graham said in an interview with Fox News this week. “Let’s close it soon and start a new chapter in the Middle East: one of tolerance, hope and peace.”

Cruz said he did not imagine any scenario in which “American shoes” are on the ground in Iran.

In the world of Maga, this opinion looks polynnish. In the Matt Gaetz hosted by the Matt Gaetz, a former CIA and the CIA and the former cabinet continues that the United States may end with a “different version of hell” even if a change in the system occurred in the end.

It is not surprising, that the Democrats raise an alert about any one side by Trump. “The Congress has not provided a license to take military measures against Iran,” said in a statement on Wednesday, led by the leader of the minority in the Senate, Charles Schumer, and that the party will not “a graceful military intervention that endangers the United States.”

These feelings are matched by a few Republicans, saved Kenkian Rand Paul and Thomas Massi.

In Podcast with Daily Livet on Thursday, Senator Paul said he feared “unintended consequences” of greater American military involvement, pointing to Afghanistan.

“When we finally left (in 2021), he returned to the stone ages within six months,” he said.

Meanwhile, Massi is cooperating with many Democrats in the House of Representatives to care for a decision calling for Trump to “end” the use of the American armed forces against Iran unless Congress declares this.

He said earlier this week: “This is not our war. Even if it is, Congress must decide such matters according to our constitution.”

Maga Firerand Margori Taylor Green, unknown for her partisan spirit, did not refer to the decision, although it was published on X: “Anyone who flows on the United States to fully participate in the Israel war/Iran is not America first/Maga.”

Iran again, but it is different

Trump has wrestled with heavy decisions that include Iranian and military power before. In 2019 He did not act with strength After Iran shot down a surveillance drone, and when it fired air strikes at Saudi oil facilities.

Trump also stood after Iran fired ballistic missiles at the American forces in Iraq in January 2020. It is now happening, Multiple sounds Inside the administration, in Congress and in the right -wing media, she was competing to influence Trump’s decision January 2020.

The last decision came a few days after Trump gave the green light to the most dependent foreign policy decision for his first term, one And on expert reports Later, “illegal” – the drone strike that killed the Iranian general, Qasmani Solimani, who formed Tehran’s military position in the Middle East and provided logistical support to the armed agents of Hezbollah and Hamas.

Solimini’s blow was on January 3, 2020, immediate repercussions and to this day. January 8, 2020, Iran has accidentally shot down the Ukrainian Airlines flight PS752All the crew and passengers, including 55 Canadian citizens and 30 permanent population, have killed all Canada’s global affairs.

American authorities have since, Including only in NovemberHe claimed that she used the plots to kill Trump, as well as other Iranian critics.

Netanyahu worker

Of course, the events of 2019-2020 were not held against the background of the Israel-Husass war. Since October 7, 2023, the Israeli army has canceled many leaders in Hezbollah and Hamas.

While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might feel that he was sought to end Iran’s threat to his country in the foreseeable future, former National Security Adviser Trump, John Bolton, told CBC News last week that they would not overlook their personal relationship strength in any oval office decisions.

“I don’t think the relationship with Trump and Netanyahu is personally as many people feel. I think Trump really wanted to know if there was a settlement (possible) negotiations.”

Another difference since 2020 is that even according to Trump’s standards, there is a great deal of disturbances in his current administration. Many National Security Council officials have been bounced It is said that some of them were not sincere enough for Trump. Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Marco Rubio is also currently as a national security advisor, after Mike Waltz after failure to chat, indicating the Yemeni military strikes that were unintentionally invited.

At the same time, Trump this week Fully ignore the comments About the Iranian nuclear program, which was created by the Director of National Intelligence, Toulcy Gabbard.

Alex Ward, from the Wall Street Journal, summarized the state of play on Wednesday.

“There is no real policy process under Trump, like the presence of (usually) with other presidents,” said Ward in Podcast. “This is what the president wants, then everyone will implement.”