Donald Trump’s offer to the army may pay fears of excessive arrival

Before a crowd of chanting soldiers in an event that appeared to be a more electoral gathering than the forces’ speech, Donald Trump defended his decision to host the first major military procession in Washington since 1991.

“Many people say that we do not want to do that. I say yes, we do,” he told the soldiers in Fort Prague, North Carolina this week to agree to the collected crowd. “We want to show a little.”

memory armyOn the 250th anniversary on Saturday-which coincides with the birthday of the ninety-seventh president-it will be an invested projection of power by the Supreme Commander who is discovered in appearing.

Trump He will head a procession of military services in the broad streets of the American capital with military aircraft that fly in the sky of the region – all of this at a cost of up to $ 45 million for American taxpayers.

The competition reflects the charm of the growing president of the military authority, as it tests his ability to deploy the armed forces to implement his local agenda by echoing the authoritarian regimes that Washington has long criticized.

Earlier this month, Trump ordered the deployment of Marines and the National Guard to Los Angeles due to the protests of California, the governor of California, to suppress the protests against the expanding deportation campaign in his administration.

Trump said that the presence of the forces was necessary to repel “evil mob attacks and violence, while others on the radical left.”

But newsom insists that federal intervention was not necessary and violates a law stipulating that orders to issue the National Guard under federal control must be issued through state rulers.

Harold Hongjo Koh, a professor of international law at the Faculty of Law at Yale University, said that the available standards set by the law prohibit the use of the Federal Police Army in local civilian areas, “How do Utuatatis work.”

“They are returning the local space. This is what (Russian President Vladimir) Putin does.”

Autocrats is also seen in the Trump administration’s increasingly ready to use law enforcement against its political opponents.

On Thursday, Alex Badilla, a California US Senate member, was treated by federal agents and left a press conference hosted by Christie sleep, Minister of Internal Security.

“What happened yesterday was part of a much larger effort to try to silence anyone who dares to ask what the Trump administration is doing,” Badilla wrote on X.

Trump’s embrace of the army as an unprecedented local law enforcement factor. Former presidents used federal forces on the American soil – especially to impose civil rights legislation in the face of resistance from separate countries in the south.

But historians say they are clashing with a long -term frequency in the deployment of the armed forces at home, even during the periods that Washington was ready to fold its military power abroad.

“The Americans have been very uncomfortable with the army that is used in a local capacity,” said Lindsay Cherfinski, CEO of George Washington’s presidential library.

She added: “The presidents really adhered to this previous, and only when there is an extremist uprising, to protect citizens, they left it.”

Trump’s ease has ignited clear with these vocal opposition standards raised to Saturday. Hundreds of protests are planned in cities throughout the United States.

“This is a fascist,” Sanzara Taylor, one of the protest organizers, said in a statement.

The optics of the show were amplified on Saturday and the military operations in California due to Israel’s attack on Iran. The president threw himself as an unpleasant peace maker-unlike the traditional republican military hawks-claiming that he would end the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine as soon as he took office.

But he is now heading a new war in the Middle East threatening its basic message to foreign policy.

His actions at home also test the borders of his constitutional authority, the system of checks and balances that have preserved American democracy for more than two centuries.

In Los Angeles, Trump, the “Federal”, the National Guard – or put it under national control, instead of the state, through a rare law aimed at combating rebellion or foreign invasions, or presidents who “are unable to ordinary forces to implement” law.

Legal experts said that he may try to justify his decision to spread the Maritime Interest in Los Angeles by calling his authority to protect federal property. The administration can also cite a 1971 memorandum by the US Department of Justice, which says presidents may use forces to protect federal jobs and property.

Even Trump was offered to the Law of the Rebellion for the year 1807, which was yearned to suppress the rebellions, although he has not taken this step yet.

But many legal scholars believe that the president exceeds his powers. Laura Dickenson, a professor at George Washington’s Law Faculty, said that bringing the army was “very unusual and unlike our rules and traditions, given that we do not have a rebellion here.”

“They were trained in foreign wars,” she added.

Two hundred US Navy-from the original 700 published by Trump-in Los Angeles, along with the National Guard.

“They will focus on protecting federal law enforcement employees” and “JG) from the crowd while they are carrying out federal law enforcement duties.”

Sherman said that the forces “were filled with their appointed weapons” and “standard control equipment”, including helmets, confrontation shields, batons and gas masks – scenes that the Americans may use from the police and the local police, but not the army.

“The attempt to keep the army out of home affairs,” said Chervinsky.

“If we lose it, it changes the personality of our republic.”