Perhaps Israel just pushed Iran via the nuclear line Nuclear weapons

Historians may distinguish on June 13, 2025, as the day when the world has crossed a line that may not be easily retracted. In a move that shocked the international community and sent global markets, Israel launched a large -scale military operation against Iran in the early hours of the morning, and its amazing targets across at least 12 provinces, including the capital, Tehran, and the northwestern Tabriz Center. Among the targets are suspected of nuclear facilities, air defense systems, homes and offices of senior military personnel. Iranian government media confirmed the death of many of the leading leaders in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC).

The Israeli government confirmed the officials’ responsibility for the attacks, and the name of the campaign that lifted Assad. Iranian officials described it as the most direct war in the shadow struggle for decades from countries.

It seems that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is following two goals. First, Israeli officials fear that Iran is approaching the technical ability to build a nuclear weapon – something that Netanyahu has repeatedly promised to prevent it, by force if necessary. Second, Israel hopes to ascend a dramatic escalation in Tehran to accept a new nuclear agreement more suitable for the United States and Israel, including removing enriched uranium stocks. Just as Netanyahu failed to destroy Hamas through military power, both goals may eventually serve a wider regional war.

While the possibility of a comprehensive war between Iran and Israel may loosen on the horizon, Friday events feel dangerous. It raises the scope of boldness, boldness and the effects of the attack-and the almost confirmed Iranian response-the ghost of the regional conflict that leaks beyond its traditional borders.

Since the Arab Spring of 2011, the Saudi Cold War has played throughout the region, where each country has sought to expand its influence. This competition has been suspended through Chinese mediation in March 2023. But since October 2023, a war of attrition between Israel and Iran has revealed through both traditional and unequal means – a conflict now threatens to determine the path of the Middle East for years to come.

Whether this confrontation is now largely escalating on one man: Ayatollah Ali Khounai. If the supreme leader of Iran comes, the Islamic Republic’s survival is mainly threatened, and Tehran’s response may be expanded beyond Israeli lands.

In recent months, Israeli leaders have issued repeated warnings that the strike on Iranian nuclear facilities was imminent. Intelligence assessments in Tel Aviv claimed that Iran was just weeks away from obtaining the ingredients needed to build a nuclear weapon. Although this allegation was the subject of disagreement by other members of the international community, it formed Israel’s decision to act militarily.

At the same time, indirect negotiations between Iran and the United States were under implementation, and focused on reducing uranium enrichment in Iran and reducing tensions through a revised nuclear agreement. US President Donald Trump has publicly supported these diplomatic efforts, describing it as better for what he called a potential bloody war. However, the talks stumbled when Iran refused to stop the fertilization of its soil.

According to what was reported, the American administration gave, while the military escalation was officially opposed to an implicit approval of a limited Israeli strike. It is said that Washington believes that such a strike can transform balance in negotiations and send a message that Iran was not negotiating the position of power – similar to how Trump frams Ukraine’s position regarding Russia. Although US officials confirm that they have prior knowledge of the attacks, they did not participate in terms of operational, both aircraft and bombs that use the bunker used by the United States were provided, which is the latter during Trump’s first period.

Initial reports from Iranian sources confirm that the strikes caused great damage to the centrifugal halls and enrichment pipelines at the Natanz facility. However, Iranian officials insist that the nuclear program is still intact. Iranian nuclear infrastructure includes multiple sites buried deeply – more than 500 meters (550 yards) under the ground and spread through distances exceeding 1000 km (620 miles). As a result, the total destruction of the program by air strikes alone at this initial stage seems unlikely.

Iranian officials have long warned that any direct military aggression on their lands by Israel will cross a red line, and promised to take revenge. Now, with the destruction of the blood on the soil and its main targets, our clouds face an enormous internal and external pressure to respond. Many high -level military officials have increased in one night of demand for a multi -faceted response.

Iran has so far taken another wave of drone attacks, similar to those launched in April and October – most of which have objected to Israeli and Jordanian defenses.

If Iran does not engage with the United States in the upcoming talks in Oman on Sunday regarding a possible nuclear deal, then diplomacy failure could represent the beginning of a sustainable campaign. The Iranian government stated that it does not view the Israeli operation as an isolated incident, but rather is the beginning of a longer conflict. Referring to it as a “war of attrition”-a term that is also used to describe the war that Iran offers with Iraq in the 1980s-the officials indicated that the confrontation is likely to reveal for weeks or even months.

While the missiles and strikes will continue in Israeli targets, many now expect that Iran can target the American military bases in the Gulf, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and even Jordan. Such an escalation is likely to attract American forces directly to the conflict, which implicates the critical regional infrastructure and disrupts global oil supplies, especially through a hormone strait. This, in turn, can lead to a sharp rise in energy prices and sends rising global markets – clouds in favor of almost every main force.

Even if the immediately proportional military response proves difficult, it is expected that Iran will act through many areas, including electronic attacks, the Work of the agent and political maneuver. Among the political options, it is said that the full withdrawal of the treaty is said about the non -proliferation of nuclear weapons (NPT). Iran has always used NPT framework to confirm that its nuclear program is peaceful. The exit from the treaty will indicate a major shift in politics. In addition, there is increasing speculation within Iranian political circles that can be reviewed by the religious decree issued by KHAMENEI, which prohibits the development and use of nuclear weapons. If this ban is lifted, Iran can follow a nuclear deterrent for the first time.

Whether Israel’s strikes have succeeded in delaying Iran’s nuclear ambitions – or instead, Tehran provoked to accelerate them – is still unconfirmed. What is clear is that the confrontation entered a new stage. If Iran comes out of NPT and starts progressing in its nuclear program without the restrictions of international agreements, some may argue that the Israeli campaign – which aims to stop a bomb – may instead end up to accelerate its establishment.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the editorial island.