The Openai Appeals Court commanded it to maintain all ChatGPT data

Openai He has resume A Court ruling From last month, he is forced to keep Chatgpt data indefinitely as part of a The issue of violation of copyright It was brought by New York Times In 2023, CEO Sam German said in a tweet on X that the judge’s decision “harms the privacy of our users” and “puts a bad precedent.”

In May, Federal Judge ONA T She said that the ruling was justified because the size of the deleted talks is “important.” The guidance notes that the judge asked Openai if there was a way to hide the identity of the data to address the concerns of the privacy of users.

New York Times Requesting the order so that it can accurately track the number of times Openai violates its IP, including the cases that users demand to delete the chats. A federal judge allowed the original case to follow up and agree with NewtonThe argument that Openai and MicrosoftTech has urged users to impersonate its materials.

in Instructions On its location, Openai drew the matter as a special issue without addressing millions of alleged copyright violations. The company wrote: “This is mainly inconsistent with the privacy obligations that we made on our users,” the company wrote. “It abandons the tall rules of privacy and weakens privacy protection.” Openai noted that the demand “does not affect Chatgpt Enterprise or Chatgpt Edu.”

the Newton Other publishing rights issues of artificial intelligence are still ongoing, because the courts have not yet decided whether Obaya, Google and other companies are violating copyright on a large scale by stripping materials from the Internet. Technology companies have argued that training is protected under the Acts of Copyright, “fair use” and that lawsuits threaten the industrial intelligence industry. The creators of this content, in turn, argue that artificial intelligence harms their livelihoods by stealing and reproducing business without little or non -compensation.