The federal judge agreed to the conditions of a 2.8 billion anti -frictional settlement, which will increase the method of operating university sports for more than a century. In short, schools can now pay the players directly through licensing deals – a concept that contradicts the basis of the amateurs on which university sport was built.
Some questions and answers about this huge change of athletics in the college:
Q: What is the settlement of the house and why does it matter?
A: A house grant is a former swimmer in the state of Arizona, to file a lawsuit against the defendants (NCAA and the five largest sports conferencesIn the nation). A lawsuit was combined with two others and for several years, the conflict with a settlement ended decades ago on schools that cut checks directly to the athletes. Now, each school will be able to pay the payments for athletes to use their name, image and similar (nothing). For reference, there are approximately 200,000 athletes, 350 schools in the first section alone, 500,000 and 1100 schools via the entire NCAA.
Q: How many schools will pay the athletes and where will the money come?
A: In the first year, each school can share up to $ 20.5 million with athletes, a number that represents 22 % of its revenues such as media rights, ticket sales and care. “These are the resources and revenues that are not present.” Some money will come through the growing television rights packages, especially forFaculty of Football.But some schools increase the costs of the masses throughTalent fee, high concession pricesand“Sports fees”Added to education costs.
Q: What about scholarships? Wasn’t that like paying athletes?
A: The scholarships and the “cost of attendance” have always been part of the deal for many athletes in the first section, and there is definitely a value for that, especially if the athletes obtained their degree. NCAA says that member schools deliver approximately $ 4 billion in sports scholarships every year. But the athletes have long argued that it is barely not enough to compensate them for millions in the revenues they helped to schools, which went to many places, including the salaries of trainers with millions of dollars. They took those arguments to the court and won.
Q: Do the players not receive money for a while now?
A: Yes, since 2021. Facing the losses in the court and a growing number of state laws that target amateur policies,NCAA wiped the roadIn order for athletes to receive funds from third parties, including the so -called donor -backed groups that support many schools. Under the house, the school can pay this money directly to the athletes and the groups are still in the game.
Q: But will it cover 20.5 million dollars all the costs of athletes?
A: Maybe not. But under the terms of the settlement, third parties are still allowed to cut deals with the players. Some call it an alternative solution, but most often they view this as the new reality in the sport of kidney while fighting schools to higher talents and then keeping them on the campus. According to the salaries of Qurtrbbeck, the best $ 2 million per year, which will address about 10 % of the NIL budget in the model school for all athletes.
Q: Are there any rules or are it free for everyone?
A: The defendants’ conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC and PAC-12) create an enforcement arm mainly in NCAA, which was used to recruit violations and the like. Among the largest functions of this new entity is the analysis of third -party deals worth $ 600 or more to ensure that they pay players “market value” suitable for the services that are provided. The University Sports Committee is alleged to be faster and more efficient than NCAA. Schools are runningRequest to sign a contractSaying that they will adhere to the rules of this new structure, even if that means facing the laws that were approved in their individual states.
Q: What about the players who played before not allowing?
A: One of the main components of the settlement of $ 2.7 billion is for athletes who participated between 2016-24 and were either closed entirely or partially from those payments under previous NCAA rules. This money will come fromNCAA and its conferences(But really from schools, which will receive lower batches of natural things like March Madness).
Q: Who will get most of the money?
A: Given that football and basketball for men are the basic revenue drivers in most schools, and this money helps in financing all other sports, it makes sense to get football players and basketball.Most of the money.But this is one ofThe most difficult accountsTo make schools. It can be thereThe ninth address on property rights concernsalso.
Q: What about all swimmers, gymnast players and other Olympic athletes?
A: The settlement requiresList boundariesThis will reduce the number of players in all teams while making all these players – not only part – qualified to get full scholarships. These numbers have harmfulImpact on Olympic athletes and athletes,The scholarships are costly as much as a soccer player, but sport that does not produce revenues. There are fears that the university talent pipeline of the United States teamYou will take a blow.
Q: So, once this is completed, all university sports problems are solved, right?
A: The new enforcement arm appearsMature. There are also collective bargaining issues and whether athletes should be considered employees, which is the idea that NCAA and schools are generally not interested in, despite the suggestion of the sports director at Tennessee Danny WhiteCollective bargaining is a possible solutionTo a lot of headaches. He was the head of NCAA Charlie BakerCongressTo obtain a limited anti -monopoly exemption that would protect college sports from another series of lawsuits, but so far nothing has appeared from the Capitol Hill.
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/AP25150684754294-e1749307094701.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link