ROBOCOP from Peter Wheeler led to a child -friendly transverse series that has forgotten her presence

Paul Verhoeven Ultraviolet Classic, “ROBOCOP”, flamented and shiny for some reason. It is a pointed criticism of America in the eighties and its obsession with military encrypted machines, along with the caricature surplus allowed by greed and corruption. It is an immediate film that the huge companies that undertake the city’s views – in this case, Detroit – which are defined through unwanted crime and capitalism that stems from their identity from the inside.

So when the Detroit Alex Murphy (Peter Wheeler) policeman leaves death by mobs, Robocop Titular technology in the creation of a Sipurg officer is designed to be effective without mercy without risking the possibility of death. While the unleashing of the monster in Frankstein in the streets, corruption is not such a major idea, Murphy’s continuous humanity (and the torment of his last moments) clung to his hard -born body,, Refining the type of hero that America needs.

A large part of these topics, of course, escapes from the glorious satirical vein, which calmly confirms the anxiety surrounding a terrible and uncertain future. “Robocop” in the end flourished in a full privilege, which led A new TV series is currently in business (with permission from Amazon)Which intends to reconsider the basic hypothesis of Verhoeven from a new lens. The paradox of megaconglomeraate to take advantage of this hypothesis (which is an enormous indictment from the outbreak) to Extended a privilege that has already been further than belief Do not waste.

Speaking of the “Robocop” privilege that is used for profit, you may not remember the child’s friendly TV series (!) That was released in 1994. What do you argue with such a story in favor, and are it disturbing until the heritage of its predecessors is honored? Let’s investigate.

In March 1994, the “ROBOCOP” series of Edward Neumeier & Michael Miner was shown with two parts of 89 minutes. The intention was clear from the beginning: this new series will ignore the major events in the film’s schedule, along with The most violent DNA for the first two people. However, it is very derived from movies in terms of commercial culture (Wild Roddy PIPER) in an episode as Cash!), But he plays Coy about everything else criticized by “Robocop”. Although the exhibition’s demographic was largely limited to children and youth, there is a great opportunity to devise these required stories with differences and conviction. Unfortunately, this “ROBOCOP” in particular coincides with hollow, such as America’s consumer vision that weakens Veroven brilliantly.

If you think I am exaggerating, let’s take a quick look at the hypothesis. For beginners, the series was manufactured instead of a fourth The movie “Robocop”, as Orion Pictures, stated that a series aimed at a younger audience that will attract less favorable comparisons of 1987. This is also the reason why a large part of the law of concession is ignored, and the series name is called characters to distinguish them from their cinematic counterparts due to the problems of copyright (for example, for example, the YVette Nipar investigator depends on Lisa Madejan in starkly on NanaCy Allen’s Anne). The basic hypothesis is somewhat the same, with Robocop (Richard Aden) recorded large bad guys on the basis of both the element, while the story introduces new characters to embody this new trend. However, none of these renewed features work in the context of what is supposed to feel the TV series “Robocop”.

There are some things that work well, such as Murphy’s father gradually competing with the truth about his deceased son, who opens discussions about the division of Siburg, and whether it is important when you love someone. However, the comprehensive series of the series feel terribly restrictions and dated, as if it was completely removed from the immortal roots that he strongly would like to leave. None of the fun bangs and (non -fatal) photography can injected the “Robocop” chain with VERVE or depth, which is a shame, at the very least.