Al Pacino starred one of the most controversial HBO films

The real crime drama has always been very popular because the fun stories in its center are guaranteed to draw an audience. The greater the matter, the more likely people are to control. Unfortunately, real crime also has to try to walk between entertainment and photograph the truth, and more often, people behind shows and movies tend to entertain. Sometimes, this means only simple accuracy, but at other times the issue can be drawn in a completely different (and harmful) light, such as Ryan Murphy’s framing for the Mindez Brotherhood in the “Monsters” series. This is a problem that existed as long as there was a real drama in the crime, and one of the most terrible prominent examples in the Al Patino and Helen Mirin championship.

In 2003, actress Lana Clarkson was found dead from a gunshot in her mouth in the home of the abundant music producer, Phil Spector, who rose to groups of fame production such as the righteous brothers and Ronit before producing Ek, Tina Turner and cooperation with the Beatles. Spector ultimately was convicted of a second -degree murder in his slaughter in 2009 in his second trial, after the first ended in the jury suspended in 2007. In 2013, HBO released a television film on the murder called “Phil Special” “Glengarry Glen Ross” writer David Mamit And starring Bakino as a disgraceful product. “Spector” took some great freedoms with the story, and people were very angry.

Basically, no one loves “Phil Special”. He was badly received by both critics and the public, who were disappointed by the strange performance options and some of the terrible wig that were somewhat worse than those in the real Special. Although the film has a card at the beginning it says it is a fantastic work that is inspired by events, the people participating in the actual case were angry, including the trial lawyer, the wife of Spittor, friends of Clarson and his family. In a huge article on the movie EsquireCritic Stephen Marci broke it:

“The main problem with” Phil Special “, however, not embarrassing offers, bad text or controversial position he takes in the issue. The main problem is that it never explains, even for a moment, why should we care.”

Although there is Stars actors are really stars A very talented writer and director in The Helm, “Phil Special” was a cavalry weapon of bad options. The film never draws that Special is innocent, and he indulges in his worst recorded behavior, but his focus is the idea of ​​a doubt about the issue that he should have kept a free man. This is controversial on top of the Cornball game that made “Phil Special” a movie to skip, regardless of how much Mamet or Pacino love.