Could the “golden dome” missile defense system be done from Trump?

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Bernd Debosman Junior

BBC News, White House

Getty Images Donald Trump in front of a sticker depicting the iron dome in the White House Oval Office. Gety pictures

Trump said the golden dome will be completed by the end of his mandate.

The warheads are rained from behind the atmosphere of the earth. Cruise missiles are faster than the American infrastructure. High nuclear explosions.

These are just some nightmares that experts warn can be fulfilled if the dated and limited defense systems in the United States have been overwhelmed by a high -tech attack in the future.

Even a relatively single nuclear bombing hundreds of miles over the heads of Americans would create an electromagnetic pulse – or EMP – would have horrific results. The planes will fall from the sky throughout the country. Everything from electronic devices and mobile devices to water systems will become completely useless.

“We will not return to 100 years,” said William Fortune, an author and arms researcher at Montreit College in North Carolina. “We will lose everything, and we do not know how to rebuild it. What will be equal to us again 1000 years and have to start from scratch.”

In response to these virtual threats – but experts say, US President Donald Trump has put his eyes on the “next generation” missile shield: the golden dome.

But while many experts agree that building such a system is necessary, its high cost and logistical complexity will make the Trump mission to enhance American missile defenses very difficult.

The executive order, which calls for the creation of what was initially called the “Iron Dome of America”, indicated that the threat of weapons from the next generation “has become” more intense and complex “over time, which is a” possible “scenario for the United States.

Patrycja Bazylczyk, a missile defense expert at the Washington -based Washington Center, told BBC that the current systems are directed towards intercontinental ballistic missiles, or ICBMS, such as those used by North Korea. But powerful countries like Russia and China are also invested in the latest technologies that can strike not only neighbors, but ocean opponents.

Among the threats defined by US defense officials publicly High -rise weapons are able to move faster than speed Fruit tropical bombing systems – also called FOBS – which can provide warheads from space.

Even – even in limited numbers – fatal.

“The golden dome is a kind of restoring its owners from the missile defense policy towards our great rival in power,” said Ms. Bazilusik. “Our opponents are investing in long -range strike capabilities, including things that are not your typical missiles that we are dealing with for years.”

A drawing that shows different types of missile threats to the United States.

How will the “golden dome” look like?

White House and Defense officials so far provided few concrete details about what will look the golden dome – which are still in its conceptual stages – in reality.

Speaking alongside Trump in the Oval Office on May 20, Defense Minister Beit Higseth said only that the system will have multiple layers “across the land, the sea and the space, including sensors and space intersections.”

Trump added that the regime will be able to intercept the missiles “even if it was launched from other aspects of the world, and even if it was launched in space”, with various aspects of the program based in other places such as Florida, Indiana and Alaska.

In the previous certificate in Congress, the newly named supervisor, General Space Fores Michael Getlin, said that the golden dome will be built on the current systems that aim significantly to the traditional ICBMS. A new system – adding multiple layers that can also discover and defend cruise missiles and other threats, including by intercepting them before launching or in the various stages of their journey.

Currently, the US missile defense agency is largely dependent on 44 ground -based ground objections in Alaska and California, designed to combat a limited missile attack.

Experts have warned that the current regime is not sufficient if the American homeland was attacked by Russia and China, each with an expanded arsenal of hundreds of ICBMS and thousands of cruise missiles.

“The current systems of North Korea have been created,” said Dr. Stassi Petigon, a defense expert at a new American security center. “A large arsenal can never be intercepted like Russia, or even much smaller like China.”

Congress Research Office, or the Central Bank of Oman, said that “hundreds or thousands” of space -based platforms will be necessary “to provide minimal defense” against incoming missiles – a expensive proposal.

Israeli Iron Dome: Example?

Trump revealed for the first time his concept of the golden dome during a joint speech to Congress in March, when he said that “Israel has other places, and the United States should also have.”

The president was referring to The “Iron Dome” system in IsraelThe country has used to intercept missiles and missiles since 2011.

However, the Iron Dome of Israel was designed to intercept short -range threats, while two other systems – known as Davids Safid and an arrow – are fighting ballistic missiles, the largest such as those launched by Iran and Fath in Yemen.

MS Bazylczyk has described the iron dome as directed towards the threats of the “lower layer”, such as the missiles launched from Gaza or southern Lebanon.

She said the golden dome would go beyond that, to discover long -range missiles as well.

To accomplish this, she said she would need to combine different capabilities.

“I will search for the driving and control system that can weave all this together,” she said, noting that such a thing is not present.

The charts display the Israeli Iron Dome and other missile defense systems, along with a map of the Middle East.

Can this be done?

Creating this system will be an incredibly complicated and cost -effective suggestion.

In the Oval Office, Trump suggested that the golden dome can be completed by the end of his term, at a total cost of $ 175 billion over time, including a preliminary investment of $ 25 billion.

His appreciation is out of sync with CBO’s, which has placed a potential price at $ 542 billion over 20 years on space systems alone. Experts said the total cost can eventually accommodate a large part of the huge US defense budget.

“I think this is unrealistic,” said Dr. Betigon. “This is complicated, with multiple systems that you need to combine together. Each of these steps has its risks, costs and tables.”

“Go quickly, you will add more cost and risk,” she added. “It is possible that you will produce something that will not be evaluated accurately … There will be failures along the way, and what it produces may need great repairs.”

The creation of the golden dome also sparked fears that it may lead to the new “armament race”, with US opponents preparing their own efforts to find ways to overcome or circumvent its defenses.

For example, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning told correspondents that the plan “increases the risk that space becomes a battlefield.”

Those who participate in the search for the worst American scenarios and defensive policy to reduce these concerns. They argue that potential enemies are already investing in offensive capabilities.

“The golden dome aims to change the calculus account and the strategic integration of our opponents,” said Ms. Bazilsic. “Improving air and missile defenses reduces the confidence of the potential striker in achieving any goals they are looking for.”

She added: “It raises the threshold for them to engage in this attack.” “It contributes to general deterrence.”

Mr. Fortune said, even the partially completed golden dome can prevent a nightmare scenario.

“I will breathe much easier,” he said. “We need this type of system. The golden dome is the answer.”



https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/369c/live/5f1f8550-37cd-11f0-8d2d-9ff0cdfc8abf.jpg

Source link

Leave a Comment