- The Supreme Court decided to shoot President Trump Among the members of the government agency, the cases will stand on their way through the lower courts, giving the president not restricted to the organizers without a good reason. However, the Federal Reserve Court spared the ruling, and she wrote that the Federal Reserve is a unique location and unlike other government agencies. Judge Elena Kagan opposed and wrote that the court’s ruling was not “unusual.”
Supreme Court Teacher resolution He has challenged 90 years from a precedent by handing President Trump the authority to launch the heads of government agencies, while sparing the Federal Reserve.
The majority decided that the members of the Governor’s Council of the Federal Reserve and other members of the Federal Open Markets Committee were outside the Trump border. The ruler states that the federal reserve is “a unique, and semi -special entity followed by the distinguished historical tradition of the first and second banks of the United States.”
President Trump threatened Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell several times regarding the FBI approach to interest rates. Earlier this month, Trump Powell “A fool, who has no idea” on the social media platform, the social truth after the Federal Reserve kept with fixed interest rates. Trump has also predicted back and forth about whether he would shoot Powell, at some point he claims: “If you want to go out, it will be from there at a real speed.”
However, the Powell state period as a president ends in May, and indicated that he will complete his term. He is likely to shoot him Instability in Bond marketWhich has seen a 30 -year rise in treasury revenue exceeding 5 % annually. The rise in returns, which means that the prices of bonds decrease, indicate great risks, which exactly happened when Trump revealed a “liberation day” tariff in April before stopping temporarily.
Even without the Supreme Court, which specifically bends the Federal Reserve Bank in its ruling, Trump may have kept Powell around him because the president could be a comfortable man if Trump’s identification policy is in a recession, Robert R. said. Johnson, Malian Professor at Creton University, luck This month.
Johnson said: “My faith is that Trump’s criticism of the Federal Reserve Speaker Jerome Powell is an example of Trump to prepare the scenario of” the heads that I win, tails you lose. ” If the economy suffers from stagnation, this is a Powell error. “
Agency launch operations
The reason for inciting this week’s court ruling was a challenge to Trump’s expulsion from Join Wilkox Subordinate National Council for Labor Relations and Cathy Harris Subordinate Warmwarry Systems Protection Council. Both clients are independent, and this means that the members serve until their conditions are raised and can only be removed for issues such as misconduct or breach of duty. Trump launched Wilkox in January and Harris in February.
Harris and Wilkox filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration because of their victories, and the Court of Appeal in the Capital Department ruled Re –. Two days after the re -installation ruling, the Supreme Court Prohibited Step.
On Thursday, a ruling was granted a residence that allows Trump’s mutations to stand while the case operates on its way through the lower courts. Therefore, at least temporarily, Trump can shoot officials for no reason, which is 90 years old of the historical precedent created by the 1935 case known as Humphrey’s Executor V. United State.
Judge Elena Kagan, who joined judges Sonia Sotomoor and Kitanji Brown Jackson, released a sharp opposition to the rule of the majority.
Kagan wrote that the artists are replacing them in the case, resemble the Federal Communications Committee and the Federal Trade Committee – and Federal Reserve Studies.
Kagan wrote: “The creation of all Congress, despite different times, from one basic vision.” “I believed that in some governmental fields, a group of knowledgeable persons likely to take from both parties-whom none of the president can remove for without reason-decisions that are likely to be submitted in favor of the public commodity in the long run.”
Kagan wrote: What Trump did is “taking the law in his hands.” Since the 1950s, no president has tried to remove an officer from an independent agency and the majority decision “ED) has become these actions. Under the law, Trump must have a good reason for the launch of Wilkox and Harris, and he admitted that he had no.
Therefore, granting Trump’s residence “not less than unusual”, I wrote.
“What matters, in other words, is not that Wilkox and Harris like to continue working in their elegant jobs.” “What matters is instead that Congress provided them with their full conditions, reserved by the president’s desire to replace his political allies.”
She also criticized her colleagues to exempt the Federal Reserve Bank – a decision aimed at preventing stock and bond markets from tanks
“If the idea is to reassure the markets, then the simplest satisfaction – and more judicial – could have denied the president’s request to obtain residency in the ongoing authority in Humphrey,” Kagan wrote.
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-2213289006-e1747953501768.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link