The first ballet dancer reactions say the same thing – this is the reason

to updateThe author Matt Goldberg published the following post Blouse: “I just spoke with an actor in a brigade, a public relations company working with Lionsgate, who admitted that” enthusiasm “was the wrong word to use it in the social siege and that it meant the emphasis on the” free of spoiler “side. Do this you want.” Our original article lasts below.

advertisement

“Ballet Dancer”, the fifth official movie in “John Week” epicAfter two weeks of release, which means that the believers are the itching rifle to find out how Anna de Armas reaches Keanu Reeves as a high -caliber tunnel. De Armas has strengthened her good -intentioned work as a deadly Cuban factor Palum in “No Time to die”, “ She did nothing to suggest her elegant killer, she was a fog in Rousseau Prades’ product, which distracts him, “The Gray Man”, so he will not be qualified as an advertisement if this task.

After all, she is in her great hands. The 87 North Productions team has not yet divided “John Wick” less than activation. Although they are fateful by handing over the “ballet dancer” colleague to the “underworld” Lynn Weizmann, who has never made a good movie, it is likely to work in the style of the home. I do not want to call a “ballet dancer” something sure, but it seems that this crew will have to be proven in an unprecedented way for a bad movie.

advertisement

Regarding whether they had made a movie worth a trip to the local cinema theater, I fear that social media reactions below will not provide much insight. This is because Lionsgate has placed unusual restrictions on what critics and influencers can publish. For every email they sent to the media:

“We are encouraging the spoiler -free enthusiasm from May 22 at 1 pm PT/4pm et. If you plan to review the movie, critical social feelings and official reviews are blocked until Wednesday, 4 June, 3 pm PT/6pm et.”

In other words, all you are about to read is positive according to the design. Now, I saw some of my colleagues in the cinema “ballet dancer”, and loved her. It appears that he should get his share of decent reviews. But Lionsgate tries to consensus the engineer here. He is not largely faithful and does not respect what I do for a living.

However, here are some of the spoilers free for the fun of your swelling! And please stick to after that, because I have more ideas about this nonsense as he is an inventor of warriors in the recreational press for 25 years.

While admitting the shaded conditions for the studio request, the film editor Bin Pearson also wrote Blouse“#Ballerina: Ana De Armas kicks a lot of donkey in this, it makes her performance at any time to death looks like a child’s play. The film begins in a state of base, but it finally settles and becomes a recreational revenge story with some creative scenes most creative in the privilege.”

advertisement

Kaitlyn Booth also believed that the movie began slowly, Writing on X (previously Twitter)It takes ##Ballerinamovie to find its foot in the first chapter (the offer does not tell him everywhere), but take off as soon as the cut is in place.

Brian Davids of Hollywood Reporter has understood the task of Lyongit, writing“#Ballerinamovie is all great types. It is exactly what he needed to be properly expanded in the world of John Wake. The procedure also supports the standard that the rest of the privilege has set, especially the bomb and cousins ​​sequence.

advertisement

The obsessed with colors was equally excited, Claim“#Ballerinamovie! It does not reach @johnwickmovie 1-4, but when the screen is cooked on the screen! The brutal work and calm! This is great themos and I cannot wait to see more Eve soon!

And movieweb Take to x (previously Twitter) To say, “#Ballerinamovie is an impressive act that boldly expands the universe #johnwick, #anadearmas governs the summer box office @Ballerinamovie.”

Now my deck.

For more than a decade, the cinema industry base was to allow critics the opportunity to spread their initial reactions to the main film publications via social media. Marvel Studios was one of the first companies to encourage it, because as soon as she got its commercial suits in 2011 with “Thor” and “Captain America: The First Avenger”, they were confident that the most prominent “obsessed” voices on the Internet would compete for their production. But there were no restrictions on what these critics could say, and no one had a problem in talking about their opinion if it was unprecedented for the movie (I was the editor of the western coast of Ain’t it it cool news at that time, and Marvel continued to invite me to clarify visits and offers after I was Meh and “Iron Man 2”).

advertisement

At the appropriate time, studios students sought to control the duration of these reactions by asking critics not to reveal any conspiracy details in our publications on social media; We left this version of what is usually advice (I did this several times because I really liked the movies). Soon after, they became more selective with calls for early budget fee. They have identified writers who appreciate the giving readers sincere reactions. When the influencers became famous on social media, they called this group to the early reaction party as well.

I am only proud to say that I played a pivotal role in this development to review films, and Wince when I see social media lights up with irrational enthusiasm on the dust of super dust or It is good as good like “Gladiator II”. Who is presented here? It is not the normal cinema player, who, unlike noise traders, will eliminate admission to watch these films. This doubles for viewers who dig the opening weekend experience, thus buying their tickets in advance. Therefore, it is worrying to see Lionsgate trying to present a new base today by banning social media publications from critics who are familiar with.

advertisement

Falsifying the game to this degree, so that all cinema pioneers on social media are a flood of non -living excitement, is wrong. Then again, in some aspects, everything is old and terrible is new and terrible again. Returning to the old days of dead newspapers and magazines, studios will distribute printed ads to the upcoming films with delirium from Junket (who was happy to go out free trips to New York City and Los Angeles, where they were placed in Ritzi hotels such as the four seasons and Waldorf Astoria). However, this seems different, because they tell critics and correspondents who wear good faith that they cannot join the chorus of early reactions, which drive clicks to web sites that are not in the bag for each major studio version. This is 100 % pure advertising for Lionsgate, and it is tinnin.