Origon Marijuana companies earn a lawsuit against “non -constitutional” state management

Before Voters in Oregon A federal judge spent a non -constitutional.

Under the 119th measure, which was approved by voters in Oregon last year, the licenses of cannabis companies may depend on employment agreements. This also means, According to Associated PressEmployers will need to remain neutral when labor organizations deal with their employees to discuss collective negotiation rights.

Drink cannabis killing alcohol sales? John Tafir says it is “no doubt” that he collides with the drink market

The retail fragmentation in Portland for marijuana, a Babez division, a processor that makes cannabis weeds and focuses for sale in the city. A lawsuit defies the procedure in February, According to Oregon. American boycott judge Michael E. Simon just his ruling two days before the end of the Hash license, providing them with a timely procedure.

Simon wrote at 23 opinion page This scale 119 violates the rights of the first amendment to the prosecutors and the condition of excellence in the American constitution.

One of the issues in the heart of Simon’s decision was whether it was National Labor Relations Law (NLRA) It applies to hemp works. The judge indicated that the state initially does not believe that the act was applicable, as marijuana is still federally illegal. In the end, they said that it is likely to be applied because the company sells both marijuana, which is federal illegal, and hemp, which is legal at the country level.

The CBD-and THC brand filled with THC was sold in the states where cannabis products are legal with the growth of industry

Simon also assumed a problem with the fact that the 119 measure does not clearly distinguish between the permissible and forced employer’s speech.

Simon wrote: “The 119 scale is not distinguished between the permissible employer’s speech and threatened or coercive words, and the defendants do not argue that the 119 scale is prohibited from a threat or forced speech only.”

The judge argued that this procedure exceeded the restriction of forced speech or that threatens the target employers who said that anything “is not” neutral “towards the union.

In the end, Simon said that the ASCEND and Bubble fragmentation was reasonably “reasonable” regarding the enforcement of the 119 measure against them “and provided evidence that by failing to comply with evaluation 119, it could lose their entire work.” However, compliance is not the solution, according to the judge’s judgment, as it is noted that compliance with this measure may let companies face “serious costs”.

Get Fox Business on the Go by clicking here

Alexander Whitley and Stephen Scott, lawyers who, for example, the two companies in the case, issued a joint statement after the ruling fell, according to Oregon.

“This situation is preparing for long -term effects, as many countries are considering imposing similar requirements not only on Hemp licensedBut also in other sectors. ”It was quoted by Witti and Sikat as their saying in their statement.

The Oregon Ministry of Justice did not respond to Fox’s request for comment.