Erika Jayne faces a “full catastrophe” where the designer pays a $ 300,000 ruling in a fraud lawsuit!

Erika Jayne faces a “full catastrophe” where the designer pays a $ 300,000 ruling in a fraud lawsuit!

Erika Jin You may be heading to the setback of another major courtroom. Real housewives in Beverly Hills Star, 53, is facing a default of $ 300,000 after a modern legal submission from the designer Marco MoraantiWho accuses her and her team of fraud and defamation.

According to the court documents submitted by MarcoIt is known for his work with his fashion brand Marco Marco, Erika And its accused-the assistants No Rebata and Michael “Mickey” is everything – It was claimed that she failed to respond correctly to the lawsuit. Moranti It claims that their failure left any option except to request a virtual rule.

The case stems from a hearing of a lost court in Florida, where Erika lawyer Jim Wilkes According to what was stated to appear. JimAnd, who was working to reject the case, was notified of the history of the court, but later asked for an opportunity to explain his absence – although such an explanation was not officially presented.

In the May 20 publication x (Former Twitter), Lawyer Ronald Richards, Who followed the case closely, commented on the seriousness of the wrong.

“The previous unauthorized proposal to dismiss Jim Wilki The attached lawyer is not recognized by the plaintiff and perhaps the court. Ronald books. “Erika He faces a full catastrophe in this case. This aggressive virtual movement can be the end of Erika in this case. ” In the court file, Marco I requested that the court enter into a virtual ruling unless it was Erika And her legal team officially responds within seven days.

“The plaintiff is required to respect the insertion of failure to pay against all the defendants, as the defendants can treat default by providing an answer within seven (7) days of default,” Moranti The legal team stated.

Ronald He also participated in additional details about the movement, with mentioning it in a follow -up post: “Here is the rest of the movement. It is a strong movement of backwardness.” Refer Erika The initial proposal was rejected to reject the case, and as of March 21, it has not been re -represented. The ongoing lawsuit stems from the claims Erika It is claimed to be made against MarcoHe was accused of gathering hundreds of thousands of dollars in fraudulent charges on them American Express card.

Marco He denied these allegations and says Erika Public accusations destroyed his reputation and caused great financial damage.

After years of litigation, Ronald Richards He already referred to this Marco It was not followed by the virtual judgment. But this has changed since then, with the designer now pushing a quick and decisive end to the case. If it is granted, the backwardness can be the payment Erika The financial officials accused her of $ 300,000-a costly blow amid her continuous legal battles related to the bankruptcy of her separate husband, Tom Gerardi.

Stay in contact with everything about tea: twitter I Instagram I YouTube I Facebook I Send us tips