The names of the final destination producer are the worst movie in the concession (which is not wrong)

We may receive a commission on the purchases made of links.

“Final” movies may be the most efficient communication of horror in the history of this type. It is organized like Slasher movies, but there is no tilted. The idea is that death itself is an invisible force, which is made for the heroes of films, and you will use any material things that happen around them – soap, cars, glass parts, screws, nail cannons, bathing basins, called what you want – to stop them. “Flicks Moviemers” challenge to create new and innovative ways for people to die, and most films are characterized by the scenarios of byzantine Rube Goldberg where the loose screw can lead to two women’s bread in the tanning family.

advertisement

The formula is durable It has been reused with all “final destination” movies so far: one character has a psychological concern for a huge accident that will kill about ten people. The park will immediately spread the word, allowing all potential victims to escape death. It seems that death had a plan, and it is now angry that birth interrupted her. Death will from now on the universe with skill to ensure that these people who were supposed to die in a disaster they actually do. No one will come out alive. All films start with a group of living people and end with movies. There is no claim for “final destination” films. Film makers know that we are only here to see people who are in harmony, and they do not even need an excuse anymore. This is “Watching People Get Impled: The Series.”

advertisement

Of course, not all “final destinations” are created equally. They rise and fall based on the quality of their killing, and not all of them are creative or smart in this regard. The concession product has long been transferred Craig Perry in The upcoming “Screaming and Conjuring: Resurrection and height that cannot be stopped for the modern horror movie”, “ He admitted that the fourth entry into the series, which was simply called the “final destination” (2009), was the worst.

For those who do not remember, it was the “final destination” that started a catastrophe in a professional race. The title indicates that the final film was supposed to be in the series, although two films have been produced since then (the latest movie, “Bloodlines”, which was opened on May 16, 2025). It was released in 2009, when Hollywood was really trying, truly It is difficult to make 3D in a widespread direction, and the “final destination”, which was directed by David R. Ellis, was shot with 3D cameras.

advertisement

“The Final” was the most expensive movie in the series so far, as it cost $ 40 million; The previous three films only cost between $ 23 and 26 million dollars. However, he was the most successful, as it was more than $ 186 million at the global box office (compared to 90 to $ 118 million from the first three). The fans may have turned into the “final destination” because it promised to be a conclusion. These numbers have also been strengthened with more expensive 3D tickets. They had the exploitation of film fans in their pocket.

Craig Perry admitted it was not good. Indeed, by 2009, he felt that the series was largely accomplished, and they could walk. Because of his success, though, he will only return a few years with “final destination 5.” As it put it:

advertisement

“I thought we are over. Then, and, the opening of the weekend. We love,” oh, well, here we go. “(…) I don’t think the fourth is good at all.

Indeed, “Final 5” is a much better movie. It was also made for $ 40 million, and returned with $ 157 million in profits. The need to see people who die randomly did not abandon. After 14 years, we have the sixth movie in the series, And /the movie I love it. Death lives.