- Professor Joao Gomez from Warton College of Business He argues that Trump’s tariff is likely to remain in place, because its revenue capabilities make them appeal to both Democrats and Republicans. Although new commercial deals may occur, the customs tariff – wide and targeted – is expected to continue with consumers ultimately the increasing costs.
Although many politicians in any parties to the political spectrum may protest against Trump’s tariff policies, one of the economics professor says that Democrats or Republicans will not choose to retreat from it in the future.
President Trump Foreign policy since returning to the Oval Office In January was Somewhat unconventional.
Initially, the customs tariff was announced in neighboring countries in Mexico and Canada, as well as its economic rival – all to reduce migration and fentian flow to the United States.
Even on the campaign’s path, Trump disturbed more customs tariffs aimed at restoring trade with partners such as the European Union, Japan, Taiwan and India. This came on liberation day, when Wall Street was shocked by a 10 % global tariff for each country on this planet and an additional increase in countries that have greater trade surpluses with the United States
While analysts generally expect that effective tariff rates will continue to decrease –It indicates a temporary stop The United Kingdom (in the early stages, China) – is a economist It warns these increasing rates here to stay.
“I think the end game is some definitions here to stay,” said Professor Joao Gomez of Warton College at Warton University at the University of Pennsylvania. “I think it causes addiction, as it causes addiction to every country in the world.”
“The truth is that governments need revenues and as soon as you see the amount of revenues achieved by the definitions, I think Democrats will be addicted to them like Republicans – or they are likely to be.” And the daily business.
“So the definitions here to remain somewhat: 5 %, 10 % in all fields? Targeted? I don’t know. But the customs tariff is definitely nothing of the past, not anything at the present time.”
Analysts began to question the possibility of such an event: A specialized tariff for some industries Or products.
According to UBS, this may start earlier like the summer, where the chief investment employee Mark Hevelli wrote last week: “The Trump administration is … preparing the basis for more surgical increase in the definitions that start this summer after commercial investigations into strategic industries such as medicines, critical minerals, wood, copper, and connectors.”
A deal or not a deal?
while Panicing about securing the “first engine” of a deal With the delivery of the Trump administration in the form of the British Sir Kerr Starmer government, Professor Gomez said that the continuous back and forth about the number of deals that will be made is guessing anyone.
What he trusts is that the customs tariff, to some extent, will remain in its place in the upcoming elections: “I am somewhat comfortable because we will be here two or three years and we will have a different system where there will be more customs tariffs around the world.
“There will be some wonderful commercial deals, possible with some of the countries that are really desperate in dealing with us – I think India is an example of this really – so I am generally optimistic that the worst has ended.”
While the worst may end, Professor Gomez told the previous luck He expects the consumer tIn the end, the bill increases for any increase in the tariff prices.
Talk to luck In April after the Editorial Day announcements, Professor Gomez said that any resistance by the Trump administration to admit that customers will pay higher prices that will prove false: “How much ultimately reach consumers, but it will be important, but it will be important, at least, that there will be a two -year or two years.
Professor Gomez’s thinking has already played in reality, adding that the deputy dean of Warton Research in his recent interview added: “I think it was a useful lesson on how the gods, the gods of market, did not.”
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-2215206485-e1747665027673.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link