- Human lawyer admitted to use an imagined source In a continuous legal battle between AI and Music Publishers worldwide The music collection, Concorde, and ABKCO Music & Records. The result of the error was that the Anthropist data scientist Olivia Chen was accused of referring to an academic makeup report to enhance an argument. One of the colleagues of the Hotholcic attorneys office, describing him as a “honest quote” after overcoming inaccurate materials during the manual review.
A lawyer representing Antarbur – an artificial intelligence company – was presented to integrate an incorrect quote created by Chatbot AI to the company amid a continuous legal battle between the company and music publishers, according to the Thursday Court presentation.
The wrong quotation was included in an expert report by the Antarbur Data scientist Olivia Chen last month defending claims about the company using copyrights protected words to train Claude, the Great Language Model. Anthropor is prosecuted due to the misuse of copyright -protected materials to train obstetric intelligence tools.
Although the quotation carries the correct link, size, pages numbers, and the year of publishing, LLM, known as Claude, presented a false author and address, according to an announcement from Ivana Dukanovic, a Latham & Watkins LLP colleague and Angroprie record lawyer.
The acknowledgment comes after he represents a lawyer Global Music CollectionConcord and ABKCO Music & Records claimed that Chen was martyred in an imagined academic report to enhance the company’s argument. While American judge Suzan Van Colin refused to ask the plaintiff to ask Chen, Van Colin said it was “a very dangerous and dangerous issue”, and there was “a world of the difference between the missing quotation and the hallucinations resulting from artificial intelligence”, ” Reuters I mentioned.
In the announcement, Antarubur Dukanficok’s lawyer accountable for the accident, saying it was “a mistake in sincere martyrdom and not the manufacture of power,” according to the deposit.
She said the Latham & Watkins team found the article “additional support for Mrs. Chen’s testimony.” After that, Dukanovich Claude asked to “provide a properly coordinated legal quote” for the article, which led to the identification of hallucinogenic sources.
Claude did not complete the quotation correctly, and he did not commit to “examining the lawyer’s manual quote with this error,” according to Dukanovic.
“This was an embarrassing and unintended mistake,” Ducanovich said.
Antarbur refused to provide further comment on luck. Latham & Watkins did not respond immediately to request a comment.
This is the latest lawsuit that challenges the artificial intelligence company to misuse of copyrights. Media organizations such as Reuters Thompsonthe New York TimesAnd Wall Street Journal They filed all a lawsuit against various artificial intelligence companies to violate copyright.
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-2212795292-e1747438333241.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link