The House of Lords returns to the United Kingdom

The UK’s Lords Council is just voting to add an amendment to a draft data that requires that technology companies reveal the work of copyrights that have been used to train artificial intelligence models, . The amendment faced government opposition, but it was amazing with 272 votes to 125 votes.

The vote came just a few days after hundreds of artists and organizations joined together to urge the government not to “give our work at the request of a handful of strong external technology companies.” Among the artists participating in this batch are Paul McCartney, Elton John and the medicine of Leiba, among many others.

The government’s favorite position was a ruling forcing copyrights to formally cancel the use of artificial intelligence models. Critics say this will be impractical and unprecedented for many artists. The draft law now will return to the House of Commons for another vote. If today’s amendment is removed, this is likely to lead to another confrontation with the House of Lords.

“The House of Lords again made the right decision by voting to create vital transparency obligations for artificial intelligence companies.” . “Transparency is very important to ensure that creative industries can keep controlling how their businesses are used.”

This is not the first time that the board of directors of the House of Lords has requested clear technology companies whether they have used copyright -protected materials when training artificial intelligence models. Again in January, the commission voted from 145 to 126 in favor of adding adjustments to the bill aimed at .

“The creators do not deny the creative and economic value of Amnesty International, but we deny the assertion that we must build artificial intelligence for free with our work, and then rent it from those who stole it,” said Baroneh Binban Kidon of the House of Lords during a discussion this week.

There are some signs that Prime Minister Starmer retracts the idea of ​​”canceling the subscription” that would force creators to seek artificial intelligence companies not to use their work. The government recently added its own amendments to the draft data law, which includes an obligation to make an assessment of the economic impact and publish reports on transparency regarding the license. Instead, Technology Minister Peter Kyle is looking into a new proposal, instead, creates a licensing system for copyright and artificial intelligence developers, .

If you buy something through a link in this article, we may win the commission.