The Federal Trade Committee supports the proposed treatments of the Ministry of Justice in the Google Anti -monopoly case

The Federal Trade Committee appeared in favor of the Ministry of Justice’s proposal to force Google to share research data with its competitors on Friday.

The Federal Trade Committee said ( Amicus message.

The Ministry of Justice is trying Dismantling Google1.8 trillion dollars, forcing it to sell its Chrome web browser, participating years of consumer data with competitors, and stop paying billions of dollars to companies like Apple and Samsung as Google are virtual programs on their smartphones.

Trump’s Ministry of Justice plan to restructure Google HURTS consumers, national security, Exec says: “Overbroad violently”

Judge Amit Mihita spent that Google was a monopoly in a violation of Article 2 of Sherman’s Law in August 2024. The Ministry of Justice may start examining Google’s activities in the artificial intelligence space to prevent future monopolistic practices.

Mihata is now holding listening sessions in treatments to determine the actions that must be taken by Technology giant To ensure competition in the market.

Google has opposed the proposed treatments from the Ministry of Justice, where the CEO of Sundar Pichai is witnessing in April that a mixture of all treatments will make investment in research and development at the same levels that it enjoys in the past “unprecedented”. Instead, Google suggested that their contracts should be renewed with smartphone manufacturers annually and to be unusual.

On May 6, the Vice President of Engineering from Google, Elizabeth Reed, witnessed that the invitation of the Ministry of Justice to Google to share user data with its competitors “undermine the user’s confidence in depth”, and may lead to a malicious one of Google’s counter -engineering actors and pumping Google search results with random messages and wrong information. She also said that Google would have to devote 20 % of the workforce in research, or up to 2000 employees, to ensure compliance with the treaties of the Ministry of Justice.

“Draconian” and the risk: The former Trump Nat advisor appears to be alerting the plans of the Ministry of Justice during the Biden era of Google

“Once it is converted into a qualified competitor, there is no other protection that we can provide … if they are anxious suddenly that the data may go to another place … they may decide not to use Google completely, (or) they may decide that they will not search for certain groups.”

When he asked to comment, the Google actor referred the Fox News Digital to the blog publications published by the company, in which it separates how the treatments proposed to consumers will harm.

“The Ministry of Justice’s proposal will force Google to share the most sensitive and private search inquiries with companies that you may have never heard of, endanger your privacy and safety. Your own information, without your permission, will be exposed to companies that lack the protection of the global level Google, where it can be exploited by bad actors,” Google said.

However, FTC referred to the invitation of the Ministry of Justice to establish a “technical committee” consisting of “experts in a mixture of software engineering, retrieving information, artificial intelligence, economy and behavioral science” as a sufficient mechanism to protect the privacy of Google users.

The committee also referred to The previous safety from Google is deviated Cambrir of Technical Committee (TC), as evidence that their security is not superior to their competitors.

Click here to get Fox Business on

The Federal Trade Committee wrote: “The previous Google failures in protecting the privacy of its users shows that independent supervision of the private obligations of Google is important and that it should not be assumed that Google does not suppose you have private and security practices better than qualified competitors who will receive user side data.”