Restart Star Trek, which would have come before JJ Abrams 2009

We may receive a commission on the purchases made of links.

This story should start with an introduction. In 1989, Guru J. Michael Straczynski brought TV His idea of ​​”Babylon 5″ To Paramount, hoping that the studio will produce and turn it into a full scientific fiction. Paramont presented a series of Bible, Bios, artworks, and even 22 ideas for a brief story that he intended to write. The series was appointed in the mid -23th century on a space station that was located in a neutral part of space. Many foreigners were going through, and the major exhibition’s characters, part of a military -like organization to conserve, had to address all the natural conspiracies of being in this situation. Paramount refused “Babylon 5”, but Strakinsky ended up selling his stadium to Warner Bruce after a few years.

advertisement

In part of the suspicious time, though, Paramount – just two months after the announcement of “Babylon 5” – announced that it will lead to the production of “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine”, which is a series also It was placed on a numbered space station, which also witnessed many foreigners visiting a besieged external location, supervised by a military -resembling a peacekeeping organization. He noticed Straczynski (In a post on his websitePerhaps, “Deep Space Nine”, Rick Berman and Michael Belller, did not see “Babylon 5”, but he was suspected that some of his ideas were, however, used to develop a “Star Trek” television program. The tensions between Straczynski and Paramount have remained clear for years.

It is important to know this context when talking about “Star Trek: Retbot The Connect”, a proposed treatment of 14 page “Star Trek”, which was once based with Praison Zebal, the creator of the science fiction series “Dark Skies”. In 2004, when “Star Trek: Enterprise” was on the air and the restarting Star Trek “Star Trek” was just a glimmer in the eye of JJABRAMS, Straczynski and Zabel on their ideas.

advertisement

Strangely, the 2009 restarting is similar to the idea of ​​Straczynski. Zabel talked about the aforementioned restart “Fifty Mission: The next 25 years: from the next generation to JJ ABRAMS,” Edited by Mark A. Etman and Edward Gross.

“Star Trek: Rebot the Universe” was actually the result of Straczynski and Zabel trying to divert their attention from the brainstorming of a common TV series they called “Cult”. It seems that the couple was discussing the “Star Trek” privilege and its location in 2004. The “Star Trek” was supposed to be called in a very sorry case at the time. I just experienced A huge bomb with “Star Trek: Nemesis” It was about to run out of the clock on the “Star Trek: Entertainment” series, which is the only “Star Trek” series on the air. It looked as if the concession was done for it, and Zabel and Stracynski knew it. Thus, they calculated that the only way to move forward in the property was restart. Familiar characters can be kept, but the story had to start again. Zabul also remembers:

advertisement

“We started talking about the status of the world of” the journey “.

((Delicious He still stands at Studio City, California, if you want to go.)

But Zabel and Strakzynski were on something. They knew that the adventures of a young Kirk captain, a young Facebook Facebook, and the young Dr. McCoy will be the only way to seize the fans again. Another original series with completely new characters will not attract the attention of an audience of Trekkies that already lasts. The main current needs to be re -presented to the ordinary.

advertisement

This is what Abrams did, of course.

Zabel continued with his ideas, noting that the new movie “Star Trek” will need to restart – any separate entity from the continuity that came before it. As it put it:

“We wanted to do what they will do in the world of comedy: create a separate world for all the continuity of” Trek “and” Trek “in order to free ourselves creatively so that we can embrace good things, enlighten badly, and try some new things. It was, it is very bold.”

advertisement

It should be noted that Zabel and StraCZYNSKI did not write a text, and they did not advance the project until their 14 -page treatment. However, they felt it was good enough to promote. Unfortunately, they were removed at the door, where Abrams hit them with punch. Abrams seemed to have already been developing “Star Trek” when Staczynski and Zabel were working on them. The fact that both of them revolve around the young Kirk and the first days of his relationships with Spock and McCoy seemed to be a complete coincidence.

Therefore, although this may seem to be another case that is likely to raise some J Thanks to the “Deep Space Nine” disaster, some “Babylon 5” fans may still be suspicious.

advertisement

Recently, “Star Trek” has reconsidered the idea of ​​”Young Kirk” once again Thanks to its listing on “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds”, a series was set only a few years before the original “Star Trek” program. Paul Wesley plays the role of the new young KerkWhile Ethan Beck is the new Spok young man.