Donald Trump’s presidency is 100 on Wednesday, and her bold and controversial moves have been born often more than 200 lawsuits, according to online publications tracking policy and legal Issues arising from the new administration.
Trump’s first presidency, between 2017 and 2021, was also characterized by litigation compared to previous departments. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) once sent a press statement specifying its legal deposit forty -fourth against the Trump administration; The American Civil Liberties Union for comparison said that it stabbed the George W. Bush administration in its mandate, a total of 13 times.
The Trump administration is also used again from the shadow table, or the emergency schedule, which is when the Supreme Court judges are required to address a problem on an urgent basis without oral arguments. According to Supreme Court historian Steve Vladik, who wrote a book on the subject, the Trump administration It benefited more frequently from this road During his first term of Bush, Joe Biden, or Barack Obama.
What is different in Trump’s presidency is how the White House interacts even just temporary setbacks of judges. According to the ABC News report, Trump Administration He was accused in court of violating six timesUsually in deportation cases.
Likewise, Pam Bondi’s public prosecutor’s reaction to the loss with a worrying language, as they issued rulings against the White House as “rogue” or “radical”. Meanwhile, Trump’s adviser, Stephen Miller, was accused by the former Bush administration lawyer From “flagrant distortion” an order from the Supreme Court signed In the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, which was greatly moved, as a victory for the government, when the referee actually called for facilitating the return of the desired man to the United States
After US President Donald Trump, his advisor Ilon Musk and some Republican lawmakers contacted the dismissal of judges because of the unfavorable rulings, the President of the Supreme Court John Roberts issued a rare public statement, saying that the appeal process exists to respond to judicial disputes.
Trump’s comments, White House officials and the Republicans in Congress who raise the specter of isolation of judges as a result of the negative rulings in the past three months led to a rare reprimand from the Supreme Court Judge John Roberts.
Below is a look at some major topics and cases that develop so far.
Co -citizenship
The Trump administration case, which will be the first time for oral arguments before the Supreme Court on May 15 and related to executive order to restrict automatic citizenship in the field of births.
Trump has directed federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States who have no father, at least an American citizen or a permanent legal resident.
One of the first executive orders issued by US President Donald Trump can have significant effects on Canadians who live and work in the United States, and the Federal judge temporarily stopped the matter, but this is only the beginning of the legal battle.
The competitors have argued that Trump’s order violates the right to be devoted to the fourteenth amendment of the United States constitution, which states that anyone born in the United States is a citizen.
If the government prevails, the United States will not necessarily be strange between developed countries. Britain and Australia in the 1980s amended their laws to prevent the so -called birth tourism, which requires the father to be a permanent citizen or resident in order for the newborn to qualify for citizenship.
In general, it is estimated by many intellectual tools that millions of people currently live in in the United States They consider immigrants unauthorizedAnd many of that group had children on their own. The case has taken importance with reports that children born in the United States It was part of the deportation of at least one From a family to Honduras – and raises the question of whether these children will have the right to citizenship if they return to the United States in the future.
Deportation
Less than a third of the total cases includes immigration issues, with questions being asked whether many American population has been granted legal procedures before being deported.
On April 19, the United States Supreme Court temporarily prevented the Trump administration from deporting Venezuelan men in the reservation of immigration after their lawyers said they were at risk of an imminent deportation without the judicial review of the judges previously.
Democratic Senator Chris van Holin met with Maryland’s man who was accidentally deported to El Salvador on suspicion of being in the violent MS-13 gang. The Trump administration refuses to return it, despite the orders of the Federal Court.
Three federal judges later criticized the administration’s approach to migration – and they temporarily stopped a new deportation in their judicial areas that were carried out using the law of foreign enemies, Law 1798 used historically only in wartime that Trump has seized as a messenger to remove some people without sessions. One of the referees who oversee the case of Abugo Garcia, the Salvaduri man who lives in Maryland and who admitted the administration was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, and the government glowed for his attempt to circumvent an order that obscures additional deportation and extinguishing the court over its actions.
Federal judges have issued at least 19 requests to stop or reduce the administration’s ability now to perform mass deportations, but the administration has also won at least nine decisions: in cases where the judges refused to prevent the government from conducting an raid on American immigration in GANTANAMO.
Immigration authorities have also detained a number of adults born abroad with student visas, a clear structure for their deportation. Lawyers of many students claim that the administration is violating the first amendment, as they say that students are distinguished by the previous data supporting the Palestinians, anti -Israel or protest activity. In many cases, there were legal objections to due legal procedures, as students were sent to the facilities of holding several states away from the place where they resided.
The Trump administration has deported more than 200 immigrants by summoning the law of foreign enemies – a wartime measure – on the grounds that they are members of Trin de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang. Andrew Zhang explains how Trump explains the language of the law in 1798 in order to avoid the standard immigration court system, and why experts say it is a slippery slope.
Government spending
The administration had a better luck in its efforts to reduce the size of the government and reshape it through the Ministry of Government Agency (DOGE), which was led by billionaire Trump, Elon Musk ally. Many judges ordered thousands of federal workers who opened fire after they were probably illegal, but the courts of appeal later stopped those rulings.
While some judges prevented Dog from reaching federal databases, others allowed him to search for agencies for possible savings.
The rights of the transgender
The administration asked the Supreme Court on April 24 to allow the implementation of Trump’s executive order, which prohibits sexually transferred from service in the US Army, one of Trump’s directives to reduce the rights of transgender people.
Many judges prevented his military embargo as well as his policies to guests in federal prisons that are compatible with the genus of their birth and restricted gender -declining care for people under the age of 19.
Likewise, there were several Legal challenges After the Trump administration canceled a set of grants For studies related to transgender health. the The argument cases argue The National Institutes of Health have crossed the legal authority and acted arbitrarily by canceling the grants that failed to provide sufficient explanations for how these studies are lower than their standards for scientific research.
US President Donald Trump celebrated the first hundred of his second term with a large gathering in Michigan, where supporters known as “Trump’s car workers” took places in Canada and expressed his agreement to the definitions of Canadian cars.
Definitions and trade
The administration faces at least seven lawsuits that defy the comprehensive definitions of Trump against foreign commercial partners.
They are led by legal procedures from several states led by the rulers of Democrats. In one lawsuit, 12 countries gathered togetherIt is preceded by a similar challenge from California alone.
The claims accuse Trump of bypassing his authority under the constitution of imposing duties without the permission of Congress. It is also said that the president can only call for the law of economic powers in international emergency situations – which Trump enjoys definitions – when the emergency provides an “unusual and unusual threat” from abroad. There is no such scenario currently, as the lawsuits say.
Other cases
Four judges have currently prevented Trump’s punitive executive orders that have placed restrictions on four major laws, and they probably considered the actions of revenge against the protected speech in the first amendment to the constitution.
A judge said last week The administration is illegal Through an executive matter aimed at stopping the outlets of the outlets of the US government and free Europe, which were established decades ago to broadcast unlimited news coverage of individuals in authoritarian countries. The administration has ordered the resumption of ports financing.
The Trump administration is fighting New York City because of the legitimacy of its recently enactive fees for Manhattan. Recently, federal government lawyers Ironically submitted to the court an internal note This appears to be arguing against his position.
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7522510.1746019809!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/trump.jpg?im=Resize%3D620
Source link