
The voters were requested in Alaska, Missouri and Nebraska last year if they wanted to ask employers to provide themPaid satisfactory leaveFor their workers. They said with an overwhelming majority yes.
Now some legislators in each of these countries are trying to review the benefits, citing fears of companies about costs.
Efforts are determined by the last attempt by legislatorsChange the laws backed by votersIt represents. In February, for example,Michigan’s year reviewsTo the paid satisfactory leave law that voters started seven years ago, with the delay in the date in which small companies should comply and allow longer before new employees are eligible.
Despite the anger of some voters, some legislators claim that the citizens who formulated the initiatives ignored the facts of the business administration.
The owner of the restaurant, Tim Hart, who employs about twenty workers in a meat slice in Hannibal, Missouri, said that the condition of the paid satisfactory leave imposes a double financial blow because he must pay a person to stay at home and another to fill this shift.
“When this enters into force, we will not stay alive,” said Hart, who urged the Senate in the state to stop the law.
Patured leave laws in Missouri, July 1 in Alaska and October 1 in Nebraska.
Richard Iker, McDonald’s restaurant worker, is among those who benefit. The petition was signed on a Missouri poll and recently traveled from Kansas City to the Capitol building to pressure the legislators to allow the law to stand.
During 40 years of work, EIKER has never received a paid satisfactory leave – not even when he was struggling with kidney stone.
“I took some medications for pain and went to work anyway and only worked on pain,” said Iker. “It was good to stay at home.”
It is unlikely that low -wage workers will receive a paid satisfactory leave
Federal law requires many employers to provide up to up to up to12 weeks of unpaid vacationFor personal or family medical issues. But there is no federal mandate to pay the price of sick days.
However, 79 % of the private sector employees received a patient -paid satisfactory leave last year, according to the Ministry of Labor. Part -time workers were less likely to receive benefit from their full -time counterparts. Only 58 % of employees in the lower quarter of the income have received a paid satisfactory leave, compared to 94 % in the upper quarter.
Although it is still an appreciation for many employers, the number of countries that impose a paid satisfactory leave has grown greatly since Connecticut was first yearned in 2012. Three additional states are required to pay for any reason, without specifying the disease.
Many of the laws of the pathological holidays, including those in Alaska, Missouri and Nebraska, apply to any employer with at least one worker. But some states exempt the smallest companies, with cutting between five to 25 employees. The number of annual paid sick days also varies.
The legislator in Missouri wants to be “less famous” for employers
On Tuesday, the state’s Supreme CourtUnder the Paid Paid Law in MissouriAgainst challenge from business groups. But the efforts made to review it continue.
In March, Republican House of Representatives issued legislation to cancel the requirements of paid sick leave. This was then banned by Democrats Minority Parties in the Senate. Therefore, Republicans pay an alternative that would delay the law until later this year, exempt smaller companies and take away the ability of workers to prosecute alleged violations.
Republican Senator Mike Berinscity, the owner of a small company that supports the draft law, said that this is the intention of “making it less well -known to employers.”
Democratic lawmakers said that many workers already have.
“When there are people who live in a salary, the mere loss of little work can actually put them,” said Democratic Senator Patty Lewis.
Sinator Nebraska warns of “huge colleagues” by colleagues
The legislation paid by the Republican lawmakers in Nebraska refers to exceptions to the medical leave paid to employees who are 14 years old, and temporary agricultural workers, seasonal and companies with 10 employees or less.
Also, legislation would strip the workers of the ability to prosecute employers who are discussing against them for using a paid satisfactory leave.
Review supporters say they aim to protect small companies from higher costs. Opponents say they mainly knock on the law.
“We are talking about complete pieces of the polling language that this offers,” Senator John Cavano said in the state during the recent discussion. “This is a great transgression by this legislative body to say that we know better than the people who voted in favor of this.”
Alaska’s Labor Party leader “a long battle” expects voters’ desires
A draft law from Representative Justin Rovridge would excuse workers and seasonal companies whose number is less than 50 employees of satisfactory leave. Many can exclude food for summer tourists in Alaska.
Rovridge, a member of the Republican minority in the House of Representatives, said that small business owners should be able to choose whether the money will be spent on the advantages of satisfactory leave or other measures to develop their businesses.
Joel Hall, AFL-CIO, who has supported the polling scale, doubts that the Ruffridge bill will get traction in the last weeks of this year’s session.
But she said: “I think this is the beginning of a long battle to protect the desires of the voters from the commandments and the whims of businessmen who do not want to pay the days of illness.”
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/AP25118726597535.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link