Labor leaders are afraid that Elon Musk and Douj can get files for violations

In the note, AFL-CIO highlights about twenty incidents and cases of alleged safety that were reported in Tesla, Spacex, and the boring company since 2016 as a basis for its concern, some of which were the subject of the recent OSHA investigations. In one incident I have informed Osha Last year, a licensed electrician named Victor Joe Gomez, the father, was killed and killed after instructing him to inspect the electric panels in Gigafactory in Tesla In Austin, TexasOSHA has not been properly separated (the issue remains open, because Tesla is actively ignoring it.)

Two OSHA Certificates included separate in other Tesla factories amputation of finger fingers. At the SpaceX facility in 2022, “an employee” a fracture of the skull and a shock in the head suffered and was transferred to the hospital in a coma for several months, “he said. OSHA Final Incident ReportAfter trying what the agency described as a technical problem with a newly automated automated piece. Spacex did not compete for the OSHA quote and a fine of $ 18,475.

Liz Schuller, AFL-CIO president, claims that a number of Tesla workers repeatedly and repeatedly to the Union have not been determined in the auto company. AFL-CIO works with UNITED AUTOMABILE and Aerospace & Amricultvent Apply of America (UAW), but it does not represent employees in Tesla or Spacex.

“It is clear that there are some dangerous safety risks in their facilities,” Deby Berkovitz, former chief of staff and chief advisor at OSHA during the Obama era, claims to Tesla.

After OSHA has issued a quote, employers have the right to challenge it, and they do so a lot, according to the agency’s general database. Of the 46 Tesla cases in which OSHA has released quotes over the past five years, the memo is martyred twenty -seven years that remain open because the car company is actively ignoring it with the agency. Two Spacex and the case of one boring company remain open for the same reason. The cases cannot be closed until both OSHA and companies agree on the terms of the quotation, which may include associated fines and the specific changes that the company must make to improve workers’ safety.

David Michaels, Osha Assistant Assistant at Obama, tells WIRE that, in general, major companies generally do not have a financial incentive to challenge OSHA, because they are usually accompanied by fines that cost only a few thousand dollars. However, the company is not required to address the specified danger that led to an accident except after the case was closed. In order to avoid addressing these alleged problems, Michaels says it is generally, some companies may be paid to keep the issues open.

“Some employers decide that they do not want to abandon the danger, do not agree with the quotation, and they will spend many thousands of dollars fighting the case, and it will cost them much more than just paying a small fine and alleviating the danger.”

There is currently no evidence that Musk has access to any secret databases in the Ministry of Labor that may contain personal information about the informants. But former OSHA managers say that the agency is carrying out home records that would control violations, as well as the employees who participated in unknown interviews with the agency’s investigators.