Prince Harry’s “unusual” director of the royal life reduced the security that was reduced

prince HarryAn unconventional decision to back down from royal duties and spend most of his time abroad prompted Rafa to deviate from the standard protocol when making a decision to cut off its security funded from the public sector.

The lawyer, who represents the Ministry of Interior, Sir James Eddie Ki, presented the argument during the second session of the resumption of the Duke.

Prince Harry’s lawyer, the martyr of Fatima KC, had previously mentioned during the opening argument that Raven had failed to obtain a risk analysis from the risk board before decision -making, a record action in determining such matters.

On the second day of Harry’s resumption of his reduced security, the lawyer for the Ministry of Interior, James Eddie K. participated.

“The analysis of RMB risk is the usual approach to the usual cases,” the lawyer told the Supreme Court during the procedures, according to the procedures. Daily Mail. “But there is nothing about the appellant’s announcement (Prince Harry) in January 2020 that he would have returned from his role in the royal family and spent most of the time abroad, and that was usual.”

The lawyer also noted that it was “difficult to imagine” anyone more convenient than the RAVEC chair to sign how security arrangements in the Duke changed to accommodate “unique and unusual conditions.”

He went on to refute the claim from Harry’s lawyer, the martyr of Fatima KC, that he was the former “former royal” had “allocated” for “the lower treatment”.

Eddie KC told the court: “It was not distinguished – on the contrary, the process that was adopted positive advantages was,” Eddie KC told the court.

Harry, Fatima KC insisted that RAVEC should not deviate from his original guidance in obtaining risk analysis.

She also indicated that the Duke does not see the new “detailed” arrangement as a better thing, but rather as a revenge, it is apparently implemented in response to his decision to leave the upper royal life.

She said: “The appellant (Duke of Sussex) does not accept that a joint means better – in fact, in his position, this means that he was distinguished for a different and less inferior treatment.”

Meanwhile, Fatima KC has repeated her position that the judge who previously ruled in favor of RAVEC acted incorrectly.

She had previously argued at the first hearing that the judge did this by postponing “error and inappropriate” to the committee on the basis of decision -making and failure to “estimate the role of RMB”, according to Daily Mail.

At that time, the prominent lawyer also indicated that “the judge had made a mistake in finding the conditions of the reference gave the RAVEC the discretionary authority simply not to use reference conditions in some cases.”

The last procedures were held in the Harry case behind closed doors in most of them due to some of the evidence provided “very secret”.

“Some evidence was agreed on this case, which is placed before the Court of Appeal, between the two parties, provided that it is very secret,” Judges, Sir Jeffrey Foss, the Lord Justice between, and the Roses Justice Edis, during the first procedures.

They added, “This evidence relates to security arrangements and levels of threats and assessments related to demands and other public figures.” It will be important for anyone who wants to harm a person within the scope of security arrangements. “