25 years ago, John Travolta starred in one of the worst films ever

John Travolta is a legend in more than one way. The veteran “fever on Saturday night” starred in many unstable classics, but he can also teach a master’s degree in the financial profession options. The man in this industry was now nearly half a century ago and did not know that he learned how to make a bad decision. Since the mid-seventies of the last century, when he played a supportive role in “Carrie”, Travolta appeared in projects that he won, but he also appeared in the many who got ridicule-to some extent Travolta now has seven full films with spoiled tomatoes by 0 %.

How does he do that? Well, the phrase “passion project” appears to be a harbinger from the star of the “imaginary pulp”. TRAVOLTA, at different points, reached his head because he loves something, he will make a great movie (with him in the leadership role, of course). The ideal of the “Gotti” 2018, which is a “passion project” was trying to get it for seven years before it appeared for the first time. John Guti’s biography seemed to ignite something in Travolta, who promoted the hell that is absolutely loving from the movie, and joined social media for the first time to sing her praise. According to the people who spoke with them Hollywood ObserverThe actor really believed that his performance was because the Mafia was without achievement. Instead, “Gotti” stands as one of the biggest mistakes in his movie and one of the seven degrees on RT.

But “Gotti” was not the first time that Travolta saw a passionate project that explodes in the face. As I said, it did not seem that the man did not learn certain lessons, even after the catastrophe that was “Battlefield Earth” in 2000. This “Passion project” in the former Travolta became a failure to destroy the earth Even the “Battlefield Earth” screenwriter apologized for the movie After the truth.

As if films like “Trading Paint” and “Life on the Line” were not enough for the John Travolta spice, it is also a silo – and it is very excited as well. At one time, Travolta decided to have to have a cinematic honor for the founder of this small, unmistakable worship, L The tyranny known as Psychlos is clearly angry that Travolta, to the extent that he mainly forced him to adapt a large screen.

Now, we have already been proven, despite all his successes, John Travolta had some of his lowest level in his career. Somehow, even managed to compensate for the “Saturday Night Fever” supplement – one of the most famous films in the 1970s – which was so bad that Owen Glybarman from Boston Globe called “Makhzi”. In this case, however, Director Sylvester Stallone has received a lot of blame for the production of such stirring. In fact, however, you can choose any contract and find a mortgage beet. So, the saying “Battlefield Earth” is one of his worst films, then, to say that it is one of the worst films in Hollywood history.

The film was made on a 73 million dollars Budget and directed by Roger Christian, a man who has been evident to form the aesthetic of science fiction movies since he helped create Lightsaber for “Star Wars: Episode IV-A New Hope” and made the Ridley Scott Space Horror classic “Alien alien”. However, “Battlefield Earth” is still one of the most disastrous science fiction movies ever.

You do not need any interpretation of more interpretation that exceeds the film as it is a closer poem for the man who gave the global santology from the “Gotti” star. However, if you are wondering about the error that happened, here is a brief explanation.

Even in the pre -production stage, everyone was largely except for John Travolta believed that “Battlefield Earth” was a bad idea. However, the actor was so keen to make it, to the point that he not only invested his own money in the project, but also forced the film to production with the help of a newly created company called Pranchise Pictures. The company’s president, Elie Samha, was particularly strong. Book “The End of the World visions: glasses of destruction in American cinema” Samha quotes his saying, “I would like to shout to everyone,” This is a science fictional movie starring John Travolta! “Repeated and repeatedly.” Such an approach that is supposed to pay attention to the negativity caused by the connection of cyanology, and after Sama was able to finance the film and its production, it seems that he retreated and bid farewell to Travolta and its partners. Make everything they want.

What they made was not good. The director Roger Christian was once told Deputy TRVOLTA sold it to the film by referring to it as “Pulp Fiction” for the year 3000 “and” Screener “. He also claimed that the actor watched the movie “Like” Star Wars “, the best only. In fact, “Battlefield Earth” was a disaster of $ 73 million, and 29.7 million dollars The global box office was the least disastrous thing about this. Travolta witnessed the TERL play, the Psychlos leader, who rules the Earth in 3000. The planet itself became hollow of hell, and BarodBoy was “GoodBoy”, Tyler had enough. Thus, humanity leads to a battle against psychological to restore the planet. Also, Forest Whitker there. Add everything, and you have a movie that left critics a little more likely.

Away from being convinced that the movie was “like” Star Wars, “Better”, Roger Ebert likened the experience of watching the movie to “making a busy trip with someone who needs a long bathroom”, and claimed that the film was “not only bad” but “unpleasant in a hostile way.” The hostility is largely a review of review reviews in general, as Elvis Mitchell of the New York Times summarizes, “After about 20 minutes of this amateur image, the extinction does not seem such a bad idea.”

Surprisingly, despite the terrible reviews and the truth of Travolta It has never been recovered after the box office flounder“Battlefield Earth” is not one of the actor’s movie 0 % on Spoiled tomatoes. It is not this site that you may believe There are only two ideal war films It should be taken seriously, but if you are interested, the “Battlefield Earth” has a 3 % rating and a 2 % classification among senior critics. This means that only one of 44 senior critics loved the movie and this critic was Bob Graham from San Francisco Cronic, whose new “new” review reached: “Is it worth watching once?” certainly. “