Six months ago, we were tending to the robot space, and we photographed opportunities in a proactive way – but we still see only a few stadiums in the month. Today, this number rose. Within just half a year, we met the running companies that stretch on running-from the models of the RFMS to the full robots, and the tools you work on.
Industry is thrived, as investment capital owners pour more than $ 7 billion in robotics companies in 2024 alone. Rounds Mega in companies such as Figure ($ 675 million B), material intelligence (Series of $ 400 million), and bottom (300 million dollars chain) indicates a significant increase in the investor’s appetite for robots. The global robot market is expected to grow dramatically, as industrial robots alone will reach about 60 billion dollars by 2034, and service robots will grow to about $ 99 billion by 2029.
The opportunity is on hand
Although robots quickly have become one of the most dynamic and fast-moving groups in artificial intelligence, they are also one of the most technical complicated groups, with a sharp-educational curve, especially for investors who evaluate new players. Unlike LLMS – as standard standards provide clear performance standards – Robotics does not have a global acceptable framework to compare capabilities across companies. This complexity stems from the unique situation in the field at the crossroads of artificial intelligence, devices design, engineering, supply, manufacturing and publishing chain in the real world-and all requires different experience of construction towards a successful company, in addition to a different set of criteria for investors to evaluate them. In short, bringing artificial intelligence to the material world is more difficult than bringing artificial intelligence to the digital world.
As investors, we aim to engage early – not only to support promising companies, but to play a constructive role in how this technology evolves. Robots are no longer science fiction. It is a rapidly reproductive fact with the possibility of converting how we live, work and build.
When artificial intelligence begins to form the material world, we see a rare rapprochement of technological progress and a meaningful opportunity. From Warehouse’s automation to the factors of automated models for individuals, these systems are not only implemented tasks-they can learn, adapt and improve environments in the real world. The companies that they adopt set the foundation for a more efficient and more flexible future – and if developed in a deliberate manner, it increases work without losing the decisive role that people play.
To support others to explore this space, we recently collected a preliminary program on the market opportunity, unique challenges to invest in robots, and our business framework for corporate evaluation in this category. It is a deep diving, so we have identified the three most important fast food to evaluate startups robots here:
1. Look for multidisciplinary excellence and future leadership.
Robots are not just the problem of Amnesty International – they are close to programs, devices, data, manufacturing and operations. The winning companies need a first -class talent across each of these specialties early, but the lineage is not enough. We are looking for the difference that works with thinking about the first principle, and building on modern technical structures, and it has a long-term vision that is in line with the place where the industry is heading-and not the place it was.
2. Do not trust the demonstration – its interrogation.
To really measure robot capabilities, it is important to understand the context behind the illustration. Does the system work completely independently or some degree of remote element? Are organisms or environments arranged to simplify the task? Whenever possible, watch the system personally. Performance in uncontrolled environments is often – especially when things do not go as planned – a more useful sign than polished illustration. If appropriate, the robot work will be depleted gently to find out how to respond.
3. Evaluation of performance in the real world, not only the capabilities.
With no global standards, investors must rely on the company’s definitions of success. Ask for measuable scales such as mission success rates, productivity, and independence. Understanding the time it takes to publishing, what is the required training, and whether the data strategy creates a reactions for continuous improvement. Ultimately, the most promising startups link technical depth with developmentable publishing models and a clear narrative of the return on investing customers. This is one of the learning of the last wave of robots – stuck in POC Purgatory.
The road forward
With the AI generation ripening from startups, the VCS needs to learn from previous sessions. Many robotics companies from 2014-2015 have obtained one-time integration operations for each customer without clear paths of implementation and the broader size. The current robots companies benefit from the efficiency of the improved devices, the methods of collection of developmentable, and the capabilities of artificial intelligence that were not available in the previous sessions. The convergence of progress in these areas puts robots in a position that allows it to go in the end.
As Digital AI advances quickly, the material world represents the next main automation limits. While artificial intelligence models increase from white collar workers through software engineering, customer support and data analysis, physical work solutions are still largely not exploited. Technical trenches that are eroded in software, as they are democratically for development, are still strong in robots due to the complexity of the integration of the material world.
The promise is not related to the automation of labor, but about building systems that increase human capabilities, learning and improved constantly through publication in the real world. These are the long, high-tech banging companies-and with the passage of time, the feature of complex data and deep integration with physical environments creates competitive trenches you will find models based on pure software that is difficult to repeat increasingly.
Investors who want to evaluate these multidisciplinary companies will be deliberately studied in building the material world and turning it into our future.
The opinions expressed in cutting comments Fortune.com are only the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect opinions and beliefs luck.
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/GettyImages-1370680085-e1757032758203.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link