007 novelist believes that the last Daniel Craig movie for James Bond made a big mistake

Photo of author

By [email protected]






“No Time to die” was an exciting movie for the dispute Among the fans of James Bond, mainly due to the fact that its producers made a catastrophic decision to kill 007. That is, they killed the Daniel Craig version of the spy, which perish in the last moments under the severity of the missiles. As you may expect, A horrific end of “no time to death” the division of the massesAnd one man definitely alongside those who wanted 007 to live is the author of modern bonds Anthony Horwitz.

The writer formulated three novels 007 so far: “Trigger Mortis 2015”, 2018 “Forever and A Day”, and 2022 “with a mind of killing. But as he said to the United Kingdom Radio TimesHe was never asked to contribute to any cinematic texts, which seem very happy. “You need thick skin for this work,” he said. “Maybe I am happier.” He is also completely happy because he does not have to address a “main issue” about how to move forward following the death of Bond. “The last time we saw Bond was poisoned and detonated into Smitherens,” said Horowitz. “How will they go beyond the fact that he died with the capital of D?”

The author went on to say that he believed that the killing of Bond was “a mistake”, adding, “Bond is a legend. He belongs to everyone, he is eternally – except in this movie. If I am asked tomorrow to write the text, I will not be able to do this. Where will you start? You cannot wake up in the bathroom and say it was everything.” Although Horwitz is very disturbed by his evaluation, there is a positive aspect of this “main issue” (even a half -super explanation about the reason for the Bond closed at all).

Bond was killed at any time for death was good and bad

With reliably demanding 007 adventures since then “Dr. no” for the year 1962 began one of the most always the most franchiseIt is a bit shameful thing that the author of the original James Bond Ian Fellang produced only 12 official novels and two collections of the short story during his life. Of course, publishers have found a way to overcome this, with many respected authors who treat the greatest spy in England in the years since the death of Fleming. Anthony Horwitz is one of them, after he got praise for his ability to restore the original style of Fleming. like GuardianAlexander Larman wrote about “with a mind of killing”, “This is a popular imagination in the most accomplished, and feels the elegant guarantee of Aston Martin.” All this means that Horwitz gets it clearly and deserves to listen to it when it comes to the legacy of 007.

As we have “Peaky Blinders” Steven Knight now writes Bond 26, Dennis Felinov will lead (It can be said, the ideal director of the job). It is clear that Horwitz does not envy the function of Knight, and it is easy to know the reason.

But while the decision to kill Bond was one of the most shocking in the history of the property, it became more understanding (and it took a dark meaning) after a long period of agency and producers Bond Barbara Brocoli and Michael Wilson I sold the concession to Amazon. The sudden blowing of 007 in the sky seemed to be a completely reasonable response to Ceff Bezos and his friends in technology who get their hands on the IP, and in this way, while Horwitz has a right to evaluate it, it was an effective effective way to wipe the clean menu before the next frequency 007. What’s more, as Horwitz himself says, Bond Eternity. Even when you kill him, live.





Source link

https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/acclaimed-007-novelist-thinks-daniel-craigs-last-james-bond-movie-made-a-major-mistake/l-intro-1758833678.jpg

Leave a Comment